Drawing
a map of the world was not an easy task. At first the details didn’t
come up. Having been raised in Japan, I instinctively drew Japan in the
middle of the map and detailed it. In fact most of the students drew
their own country or the location of their country in the middle and
like me detailed what they were familiar with. In addition some of us
exaggerated the dimension of their native country. However the more
distant the location was, the more difficulties student experimented to
draw accurately the shape of each countries and even main lands. Because
most students were familiar with Japan, the shape of the country was
detailed. However, the shape o f Eurasia, America and Africa were drawn
as squares or circles. Since I am half Italian, I am more familiar with
Italy and Europe in general. My map of Europe was therefore more
accurately drawn. On most of the students’ map, including mine, poles
were not displayed. Others did not even draw Italy within Europe.
Another difference I noticed among students’ drawing was the style.
Indeed, some of them were in two dimensions while others were in three
dimensions. After finishing the exercise we were asked to take a look at
others works and requested to repeat the exercise. I was amazed on how
people’s perception of the world changed after this. Most of them
acknowledged that three dimension was more appropriated and thus started
to copy this style. Most of them did include the poles and rescaled
their country to the rest of the world. Also, after checking others map,
most of us were able to draw the world map more effectively. This
shows how people’s perception is usually influenced by their
environment, culture
and education. For instance, people from the south hemisphere are more
likely to draw it upside down, even if they probably think that our way
is the upside down one. I unfortunately got extremely confused after
viewing my classmates’ work. The huge amount of differences overwhelmed
me and I suddenly could not picture the world map anymore. As a result I
was unable to complete the exercise and started to feel embarrassed. I
also started to question myself over the reasons that put me in this
situation.
Not
only did we learn that everyone has its own perception of the world,
but also that we can easily get influenced by others. Our own perception
of the world had indeed changed after having a look at others work. As a
conclusion, we can then assume that every social topic can be
controversial because of everyone’s different perception, different
background and religion.
Umene Shikata
I was not in the class when this exercise took place, but after reading your post I clearly got the picture. I also would have drawn the land I am most familiar with in the middle with accurate details. Map is surely a symbolic drawing of how we conceive the world. I also found it interesting that you have expanded the lesson from the exercise-interrelating perception- to the (probable) cause of controversies in the society.
ReplyDelete