Foreign aid can support local area in 3rd world nations?

Foreign aid can support local area in 3rd world nations?

Yangee

   Foreign aid is flowed into the under-developed nations, which have purposes as developing infrastructure, solving dearth and so forth. In our common sense, this aid would help those countries not only internal problems but also external ones. However the world is not that kind to support others without any interests. Those are not merely given by humanity or philanthropic mind. It surely comes form some vicious goals that the nations having power to control the world, totally desire to have as making economical colony and widening their global influences. As a circumstance, the 3^rd world nations must be confronted huge barriers that make them not to go beyond of poverty, about the economic growth. Suppose that waiting for powerful nations until being kind to give aid without any interests is silly behavior that never comes true. Thus, to go beyond of those disturbances, what those nations do? The most reliable way is to construct a local market.

    Those nations should stop relying on foreign aid came from capitalized countries and building local markets to maintain domestic governance. Local peasants have their own way to maintain their lives. However foreign pressure and capitalistic economy have forced them to change the crops to other products consumer demands (Scott, 1976). The very first time of changing the crops would give significant profits to farmers. Unlike their expectation, unkind fluctuation of prices or changed favors of consumer make them into bankruptcy or dearth. They can do self-sufficiency. They grow some crops for their food and breed fishes in their reservoir.  Even if they do not want to take market economy’s idea and keep their traditional economy, they need money for education or hospital fee. Therefore to overcome this problem, local market should give a way. It gives two positive effects to local economy. The first one is that it does not give any pressure to peasants to sell their food for eating and let them sell even small amount products, as they want to sell. Thus the peasants can have profits even if those are small. As following this circumstance, they can maintain the education or hospital fee. Besides it makes local profits not to go outside of village. In economic market, all output of local area go into capitalists’ pockets and nothing left for local inhabitants. However local market can prevent it. One of rules of governing local market is boycotting outsider’s goods. They do not give any profit for outsiders and make cycle of capital to support their own. Therefore governing this market, local area can be independent from government and the government also can be free from foreign debt by supported from local areas (優, 2007).

   Unfortunately, the world still enforces poor countries to receive foreign aid, but it is obviously not the way to solve the famine. It would be short-term solution, yet it is not permanent way (Ziegler, 2011). The real solution for local poverty is the way that how to maintain their lives as human being continuously. Thus the best fit of that idea is local market. The world still demands poor nations to receive it. Nonetheless output significantly shows that it is not working. However to achieve local maintenance and freedom from debts, local market should be adopted.

Scott, J. (1976). The moral economy fo the peasant: Rebellion and subsistence in southeast asia. (pp. 1-246). London, England: Yale University Press.

Ziegler, J. (2011).La faim dans le monde expliquée à mon fils. (2 ed., p.1- 74). Seuil.

優, 田中. (2007). おカネで世界を変える30の方法. (pp. 1-141). 合同出版.